Disability and Sexuality: Desiring, Not Fetishizing

What is sex? What is desire, desirability? For many people, the idea of sex and sex appeal rests on the cornerstone of physical strength and virility. A sexy body is powerful, long-lasting, and ready to go.

Great sex is physically intense, readily available, and reliant on genitals that respond properly. For anyone who can’t live up to these ideals, society thinks of them as undesirable or non-sexual, even childlike. If you can’t look and respond in the cookie-cutter way that the media and culture see sex, then are you even a real adult? A valuable person?

At the core of these issues is the topic of ableism. Ableism is the idea that bodies with disabilities are inferior to those without disabilities. There is a multitude of ways that this kind of thinking harms everyone.

From accessibility and physically navigating spaces to lack of resources such as education, housing, and healthcare the idea that people with disabilities are less worthy of every good and vital thing that life has to offer is one of the most pervasive and rarely discussed social ills.

In regards to sex and relationships, ableism feeds into two main narratives—that people with disabilities are either to be infantilized (seen as children and thus non-sexual) or fetishized (seen as an exotic sexual experience or the focus of dysmorphophilia) but almost never fully-fledged human beings.

Disability as a term is a broad and far-reaching umbrella concept that includes everything from people with chronic acute depression to those with visual impairment to folks with cognitive processing differences. Because of this, it is impossible to say that a certain experience is universal to all people in the disabled community but there are common threads of experience.

So how do we create conversations about including people of all abilities and are included in conversations and visions of desirability and sex without othering or fetishizing them?

Sex educators Jaxson 'J.B.' Benjamin and Hilary Wermers specialize on the intersections of sexuality and disability. I asked them to share some of their thoughts on this topic:

Read: A Sex Educator Tells Us About Sex Ed for People With Disabilities (and Why We Need It)

1. On the most 101 basic level, how would you explain how ableism impacts sexuality?

Jax: Put very simply, ableism impacts disabled folks' sexuality on two different levels.

Ableist behaviors show up in the media regularly which is very hard to get away from in today's world. Disabled representation in T.V. shows, books, you name it, and stereotypes of perfect bodies affect our self-image. We are depicted as "the other", frequently labeled as "ugly", used in the role of the "bad guy", a character to be looked after or pitied or just not represented at all. It's rare to find a representation of a person with a disability who is deemed sexy or a dynamic character which drastically impacts how people create their self-image.

Hilary: Ableism denies the humanity of disabled individuals and their right to sexual agency and autonomy. Ableism stops us from seeing disabled individuals as full people with desires of our own and the capacity for pleasure.

2. Can you speak to the ways that ableism intersections with people with disabilities being either infantilized or fetishized?

Jax: Ableist representations can enforce the stereotype of the "pitiful" disabled person who needs caring for. This narrative dehumanizes the individual, it is subtly but forcefully conveying that a person who is disabled is not a whole person, they are missing their sexuality.

The person is treated like a child who needs to be looked after and has not developed sexual feelings. This paternalistic view results in people with disabilities being isolated from romantic or intimate relationships and has seen forced or secretive sterilizations and abortions performed on disabled folks as we have been deemed not worthy of procreating.

The flip side to that coin is the fetishization that can be pushed on people with disabilities. Devotees that are only interested in a person's use of assistive tech or mobility aides again dehumanize us. This lust for an object or part of our identity does not view the disabled person as a full, multi-faceted individual. A disabled person's sexual identity includes all of them or however much they would like it to.

Hilary: Ableism tells us that sexuality is not for disabled people (infantilization/desexualization) AND that disabled people are sexual objects (fetishization). Disabled bodies are protected and shielded from sexuality by overanxious caregivers and lack of sexuality education while they are simultaneously the object of secret, often shame-laden, lusts.